<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 10 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Service Tax demand upheld by the Commissioner, noting the lack of documented evidence supporting the repair work activities. Without contracts or agreements, the demand was deemed unsustainable. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, providing consequential benefits to the appellant as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 10 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Service Tax demand upheld by the Commissioner, noting the lack of documented evidence supporting the repair work activities. Without contracts or agreements, the demand was deemed unsustainable. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, providing consequential benefits to the appellant as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>