<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 2 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434616</link>
    <description>Packaged drinking water classification was disputed on the basis of BIS specifications and the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011, with the opposite party contending that the product fell within packaged drinking water rather than natural mineral water. The matter was adjourned for further consideration, leaving the classification issue open for later determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 01:21:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 2 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434616</link>
      <description>Packaged drinking water classification was disputed on the basis of BIS specifications and the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011, with the opposite party contending that the product fell within packaged drinking water rather than natural mineral water. The matter was adjourned for further consideration, leaving the classification issue open for later determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>