<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1125 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434610</link>
    <description>Compulsory acquisition of land transfers title by operation of law rather than through a negotiated sale, so section 50C cannot deem stamp-duty value as capital-gains consideration where stamp valuation is inapplicable. Compensation under the land-acquisition regime, read with the statutory exemption framework and CBDT Circular No. 36/2016, is therefore not subject to section 50C. The alleged coal shortage was also unsupported because the relevant quantity was recorded in the financial statements, notes to accounts and board resolution; deletion of that addition was justified. The revenue&#039;s appeal failed, leaving the appellate relief undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1125 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434610</link>
      <description>Compulsory acquisition of land transfers title by operation of law rather than through a negotiated sale, so section 50C cannot deem stamp-duty value as capital-gains consideration where stamp valuation is inapplicable. Compensation under the land-acquisition regime, read with the statutory exemption framework and CBDT Circular No. 36/2016, is therefore not subject to section 50C. The alleged coal shortage was also unsupported because the relevant quantity was recorded in the financial statements, notes to accounts and board resolution; deletion of that addition was justified. The revenue&#039;s appeal failed, leaving the appellate relief undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>