<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434585</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed all six appeals, affirming that &#039;parts of Articles of jewellery&#039; and &#039;parts of Articles of silver jewellery&#039; are not covered under the respective exemption notifications unless explicitly included. The decision underscores the importance of strict interpretation of exemption notifications and the necessity for clear legislative intent to extend exemptions to specific items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434585</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed all six appeals, affirming that &#039;parts of Articles of jewellery&#039; and &#039;parts of Articles of silver jewellery&#039; are not covered under the respective exemption notifications unless explicitly included. The decision underscores the importance of strict interpretation of exemption notifications and the necessity for clear legislative intent to extend exemptions to specific items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>