<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 201 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31943</link>
    <description>Photographic services were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-ST for the value of inputs used in providing the service. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions on the same question and declined to depart from the settled view, applying the same ratio to the present appeals. As a result, the orders denying the deduction or exemption were set aside and relief was granted to the assessee on the input-value claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 201 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31943</link>
      <description>Photographic services were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-ST for the value of inputs used in providing the service. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions on the same question and declined to depart from the settled view, applying the same ratio to the present appeals. As a result, the orders denying the deduction or exemption were set aside and relief was granted to the assessee on the input-value claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>