<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 97 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal as time-barred due to a significant delay in filing beyond the condonable period. Relying on Delhi High Court precedent, the Tribunal found that cited case laws did not alter the legal position, emphasizing the strict limitation on condoning appeal delays. Despite appellants&#039; reliance on specific circumstances in other cases, the Tribunal affirmed the dismissal, stating the equitable relief granted previously did not apply. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, aligning with the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling in Delta Impex, and the stay application was also denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 97 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal as time-barred due to a significant delay in filing beyond the condonable period. Relying on Delhi High Court precedent, the Tribunal found that cited case laws did not alter the legal position, emphasizing the strict limitation on condoning appeal delays. Despite appellants&#039; reliance on specific circumstances in other cases, the Tribunal affirmed the dismissal, stating the equitable relief granted previously did not apply. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, aligning with the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling in Delta Impex, and the stay application was also denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>