<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1076 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434561</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding that the loss claimed by the assessee of 99.055 kgs of gold was not adequately substantiated. The Court held that the burden of proof lay with the assessee, which was not satisfactorily discharged. The ITAT&#039;s decision was set aside, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was restored, as the explanations provided were unsupported by evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 08:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1076 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434561</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, finding that the loss claimed by the assessee of 99.055 kgs of gold was not adequately substantiated. The Court held that the burden of proof lay with the assessee, which was not satisfactorily discharged. The ITAT&#039;s decision was set aside, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was restored, as the explanations provided were unsupported by evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>