<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1072 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434557</link>
    <description>Section 153D mandates the AO to obtain prior approval of the Joint Commissioner on the draft assessment order for each assessment year covered by s.153A search assessments. On a conjoint reading of ss.153A(1) and 153D, year-wise approval is a condition precedent to a valid assessment order. Where draft orders for 38 assessment years (including other group cases) were placed before the approving authority and approved on the same day, the Tribunal&#039;s inference that approval was granted mechanically without independent application of mind was not perverse. Consequently, no substantial question of law arose in the second appeal, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1072 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434557</link>
      <description>Section 153D mandates the AO to obtain prior approval of the Joint Commissioner on the draft assessment order for each assessment year covered by s.153A search assessments. On a conjoint reading of ss.153A(1) and 153D, year-wise approval is a condition precedent to a valid assessment order. Where draft orders for 38 assessment years (including other group cases) were placed before the approving authority and approved on the same day, the Tribunal&#039;s inference that approval was granted mechanically without independent application of mind was not perverse. Consequently, no substantial question of law arose in the second appeal, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>