<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 357 - HIGH COURT KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31935</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the dismissal of the writ petition and refusal to quash impugned orders by the Single Judge was dismissed due to significant delay in filing the petition and failure to establish violations of natural justice. The Single Judge found no illegality in the respondent&#039;s actions and declined to exercise discretionary power to grant relief, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 357 - HIGH COURT KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31935</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the dismissal of the writ petition and refusal to quash impugned orders by the Single Judge was dismissed due to significant delay in filing the petition and failure to establish violations of natural justice. The Single Judge found no illegality in the respondent&#039;s actions and declined to exercise discretionary power to grant relief, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>