https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306812 The High Court asserted jurisdiction to entertain the writ petitions despite challenges based on parties' locations. The doctrine of forum conveniens was applied, emphasizing the petitioner's choice of forum unless extreme inconvenience exists. The Court clarified that parties could choose either court, including where the appellate authority is situated. Territorial jurisdiction was established as the Appellate Forum had been approached. The Court affirmed the Adjudicating Officer's authority and issued interim directions restraining certain actions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The judgment provided a thorough analysis of jurisdictional issues and legal doctrines, ensuring a comprehensive review of the complex legal matters at hand. en-us Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Feb 2023 08:10:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306812 The High Court asserted jurisdiction to entertain the writ petitions despite challenges based on parties' locations. The doctrine of forum conveniens was applied, emphasizing the petitioner's choice of forum unless extreme inconvenience exists. The Court clarified that parties could choose either court, including where the appellate authority is situated. Territorial jurisdiction was established as the Appellate Forum had been approached. The Court affirmed the Adjudicating Officer's authority and issued interim directions restraining certain actions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The judgment provided a thorough analysis of jurisdictional issues and legal doctrines, ensuring a comprehensive review of the complex legal matters at hand. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306812