<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 16(2)(c)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118398</link>
    <description>Whether recipients may retain input tax credit when the supplier declared higher tax but paid only part of that tax, given the statutory condition that tax charged must have been actually paid to the Government or discharged through admissible input tax credit. The core question is whether the recipient must reverse credit in full or only proportionately to the unpaid tax, in light of reconciliation and statutory mechanisms addressing supplier payment shortfalls.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2023 09:45:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 16(2)(c)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118398</link>
      <description>Whether recipients may retain input tax credit when the supplier declared higher tax but paid only part of that tax, given the statutory condition that tax charged must have been actually paid to the Government or discharged through admissible input tax credit. The core question is whether the recipient must reverse credit in full or only proportionately to the unpaid tax, in light of reconciliation and statutory mechanisms addressing supplier payment shortfalls.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2023 09:45:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>