<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1693 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306808</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of Rs. 94,90,000/- paid towards the cancellation of Banakhat deeds while computing Short Term Capital Gains on the sale of agricultural land. The ITAT emphasized the consistency in treatment of similar transactions among co-owners and the disclosure of compensation by the recipients in their income tax returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2023 09:22:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1693 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306808</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of Rs. 94,90,000/- paid towards the cancellation of Banakhat deeds while computing Short Term Capital Gains on the sale of agricultural land. The ITAT emphasized the consistency in treatment of similar transactions among co-owners and the disclosure of compensation by the recipients in their income tax returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>