https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434513 A woman accused in an SFIO investigation under the Companies Act, 2013 sought regular bail despite the stringent bar in section 212(6) for offences under section 447. The Court noted that the proviso exempts women from that restriction, but the exemption does not create an automatic entitlement to release and ordinary bail principles still apply. Because the complaint had been filed, the applicant had joined investigation, custody was not shown to be necessary, and there was no material of tampering, witness influence, or flight risk beyond conditions, regular bail was granted subject to terms. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 26 Feb 2023 09:22:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434513 A woman accused in an SFIO investigation under the Companies Act, 2013 sought regular bail despite the stringent bar in section 212(6) for offences under section 447. The Court noted that the proviso exempts women from that restriction, but the exemption does not create an automatic entitlement to release and ordinary bail principles still apply. Because the complaint had been filed, the applicant had joined investigation, custody was not shown to be necessary, and there was no material of tampering, witness influence, or flight risk beyond conditions, regular bail was granted subject to terms. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434513