<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 142 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, subject to the principle of unjust enrichment. The decision was based on the interpretation of the duty rate applicable to goods cleared from a warehouse, as clarified by the Supreme Court in a related case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 142 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, subject to the principle of unjust enrichment. The decision was based on the interpretation of the duty rate applicable to goods cleared from a warehouse, as clarified by the Supreme Court in a related case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>