<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Imposed u/s 114 of Customs Act for Over-Valued Goods; Key Issue: January 31, 2017 Letter&#039;s Significance.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68465</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Over-valuation of goods to avail a higher duty drawback - There is no dispute that the goods were over-valued. Therefore, the questions involved in the present appeals, essentially, are whether the letter dated 31.01.2017 was, in fact, sent and, if so, what is the import of the said letter. - Appellant failed to prove its case - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2023 11:38:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2023 11:38:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Imposed u/s 114 of Customs Act for Over-Valued Goods; Key Issue: January 31, 2017 Letter&#039;s Significance.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68465</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Over-valuation of goods to avail a higher duty drawback - There is no dispute that the goods were over-valued. Therefore, the questions involved in the present appeals, essentially, are whether the letter dated 31.01.2017 was, in fact, sent and, if so, what is the import of the said letter. - Appellant failed to prove its case - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2023 11:38:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>