<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1004 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Pr.CIT&#039;s order invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding the write-back of provisions for bad and doubtful debts should be taxed. The Tribunal held that the Pr.CIT followed due process, providing adequate opportunities for the assessee to present their case. The Tribunal also clarified that Explanation-2 to Section 263 did not need to be explicitly mentioned in the show-cause notice. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2023 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1004 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Pr.CIT&#039;s order invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding the write-back of provisions for bad and doubtful debts should be taxed. The Tribunal held that the Pr.CIT followed due process, providing adequate opportunities for the assessee to present their case. The Tribunal also clarified that Explanation-2 to Section 263 did not need to be explicitly mentioned in the show-cause notice. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>