<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 987 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434472</link>
    <description>Natural justice was not established as a ground to interfere with the assessment orders because the record did not show denial of a fair hearing, and delay in receiving notice was not followed by any immediate intimation explaining non-appearance. The dealer was nonetheless entitled to seek consideration of C and F declaration forms after assessment, because post-assessment declaration material cannot be rejected merely for late production and may be examined through rectification under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, read with the corresponding corrective power under sales tax law. The assessment orders were left intact, but rectification proceedings were permitted and coercive action was kept in abeyance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 987 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434472</link>
      <description>Natural justice was not established as a ground to interfere with the assessment orders because the record did not show denial of a fair hearing, and delay in receiving notice was not followed by any immediate intimation explaining non-appearance. The dealer was nonetheless entitled to seek consideration of C and F declaration forms after assessment, because post-assessment declaration material cannot be rejected merely for late production and may be examined through rectification under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, read with the corresponding corrective power under sales tax law. The assessment orders were left intact, but rectification proceedings were permitted and coercive action was kept in abeyance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>