https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306797 The Supreme Court held that the interference with the Catering Policy of 2005 by the Division Bench of Orissa High Court was not justified. Government policy decisions should not be interfered with unless contrary to statutory rules or the Constitution. As no evidence showed the Policy violated legal provisions, the Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeals. The appeal was dismissed based on previous orders, and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2023 14:39:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306797 The Supreme Court held that the interference with the Catering Policy of 2005 by the Division Bench of Orissa High Court was not justified. Government policy decisions should not be interfered with unless contrary to statutory rules or the Constitution. As no evidence showed the Policy violated legal provisions, the Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeals. The appeal was dismissed based on previous orders, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306797