<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 643 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306795</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the pensioners&#039; petitions seeking higher pension benefits based on the revised pay scale of Rs. 14,300 - 18,300. It upheld the validity of the office memorandum dated 11.05.2001 and clarified that pension calculations should be based on the revised scale corresponding to the last drawn pay scale at the time of retirement. The court set aside CAT&#039;s orders inconsistent with these principles, determining that pensioners were not entitled to the revised scale if they did not hold the corresponding pre-revised scale before retirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 10:41:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 643 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306795</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the pensioners&#039; petitions seeking higher pension benefits based on the revised pay scale of Rs. 14,300 - 18,300. It upheld the validity of the office memorandum dated 11.05.2001 and clarified that pension calculations should be based on the revised scale corresponding to the last drawn pay scale at the time of retirement. The court set aside CAT&#039;s orders inconsistent with these principles, determining that pensioners were not entitled to the revised scale if they did not hold the corresponding pre-revised scale before retirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>