<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The Court may relax latches incase a professional misleads</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11143</link>
    <description>The Doctrine of Laches is applied flexibly, with courts assessing delay and its explanation on a case-by-case basis. Delay caused by reliance on professional advice may not be imputed to the claimant and can justify condonation so the matter is decided on merits. Authorities should not adopt technical pleas to deny lawful rights; tribunals must prima facie examine whether the appellant has a meritorious case before refusing relief for delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:12:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 10:25:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The Court may relax latches incase a professional misleads</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11143</link>
      <description>The Doctrine of Laches is applied flexibly, with courts assessing delay and its explanation on a case-by-case basis. Delay caused by reliance on professional advice may not be imputed to the claimant and can justify condonation so the matter is decided on merits. Authorities should not adopt technical pleas to deny lawful rights; tribunals must prima facie examine whether the appellant has a meritorious case before refusing relief for delay.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:12:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>