https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434463 Bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered in a CGST prosecution where the accused had been in judicial custody since 04.11.2022, the challan had been filed, and no further investigation remained pending. The Court noted that the trial was likely to take considerable time and that continued custody could exceed the statutory punishment period for the alleged offence under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act. Bail was therefore granted, subject to bail bonds and a monetary deposit under protest. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434463 Bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered in a CGST prosecution where the accused had been in judicial custody since 04.11.2022, the challan had been filed, and no further investigation remained pending. The Court noted that the trial was likely to take considerable time and that continued custody could exceed the statutory punishment period for the alleged offence under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act. Bail was therefore granted, subject to bail bonds and a monetary deposit under protest. Case-Laws GST Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434463