<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 964 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on the assessee for concealing income by failing to file a return within the specified period. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the notice issued under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) was defective, emphasizing that the assessee comprehended the nature of the offense. The penalty was deemed justified based on the failure to file a return, which was considered as concealment of income under Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 964 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on the assessee for concealing income by failing to file a return within the specified period. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the notice issued under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) was defective, emphasizing that the assessee comprehended the nature of the offense. The penalty was deemed justified based on the failure to file a return, which was considered as concealment of income under Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>