https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434438 The court held that adjudicating the same set of allegations by two authorities was impermissible. The order dated 14.02.2022 was set aside due to lack of jurisdiction and remanded for fresh adjudication. The order dated 26.03.2022 was upheld, allowing the petitioners to appeal within four weeks without delay concerns. The court reserved its opinion on the merits of the allegations. en-us Mon, 13 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Mar 2023 12:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434438 The court held that adjudicating the same set of allegations by two authorities was impermissible. The order dated 14.02.2022 was set aside due to lack of jurisdiction and remanded for fresh adjudication. The order dated 26.03.2022 was upheld, allowing the petitioners to appeal within four weeks without delay concerns. The court reserved its opinion on the merits of the allegations. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 13 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434438