https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434437 The court overturned the rejection of an LLP name reservation application due to the use of "AND ASSOCIATES," clarifying that it did not require approval from professional governing bodies as it was a generic term. The court directed the respondents to process the application and issue registration accordingly, emphasizing the misinterpretation of Rule 18(2)(xvi) of the LLP Rules. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:06:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434437 The court overturned the rejection of an LLP name reservation application due to the use of "AND ASSOCIATES," clarifying that it did not require approval from professional governing bodies as it was a generic term. The court directed the respondents to process the application and issue registration accordingly, emphasizing the misinterpretation of Rule 18(2)(xvi) of the LLP Rules. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434437