<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 196 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31914</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore upheld the levy of service tax on the appellants as service providers for the construction of residential complexes. Penalties were set aside due to doubts about liability and prior payment of service tax, while interest liability was upheld. The Tribunal classified the service under Works Contract Service and considered the abatement method in determining the duty demand. The judgment was pronounced on 28.7.2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 196 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31914</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore upheld the levy of service tax on the appellants as service providers for the construction of residential complexes. Penalties were set aside due to doubts about liability and prior payment of service tax, while interest liability was upheld. The Tribunal classified the service under Works Contract Service and considered the abatement method in determining the duty demand. The judgment was pronounced on 28.7.2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>