<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the initial revision order by the PCIT was valid, but subsequent revisions were debatable with two views despite detailed inquiries. The Tribunal found that the AO had conducted necessary investigations and verifications, ultimately quashing the later revisionary order by the PCIT as unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:04:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the initial revision order by the PCIT was valid, but subsequent revisions were debatable with two views despite detailed inquiries. The Tribunal found that the AO had conducted necessary investigations and verifications, ultimately quashing the later revisionary order by the PCIT as unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>