<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1295 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306782</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals, upholding the disallowance of non-genuine purchases for assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of the purchases, leading to a 12.5% disallowance. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Act, stating the Assessing Officer had tangible material indicating non-genuine purchases. The decision was rendered on 18th January 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 09:04:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1295 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306782</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals, upholding the disallowance of non-genuine purchases for assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of the purchases, leading to a 12.5% disallowance. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Act, stating the Assessing Officer had tangible material indicating non-genuine purchases. The decision was rendered on 18th January 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>