<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 61 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31909</link>
    <description>The case involved the classification of Agilent Technologies&#039; Spectrum Analyzers under the Customs Act 1962 in India. The ruling classified both the E 4443 A and E 4447 A models under 9030 40 00 of the Customs Tariff, agreeing with the applicant&#039;s contention that these analyzers, designed for telecommunications with specific features for telecom applications, should be classified as such. The decision was rendered on November 18, 2008, by Mrs. Chitra Saha, Member of the Authority for Advance Rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 61 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31909</link>
      <description>The case involved the classification of Agilent Technologies&#039; Spectrum Analyzers under the Customs Act 1962 in India. The ruling classified both the E 4443 A and E 4447 A models under 9030 40 00 of the Customs Tariff, agreeing with the applicant&#039;s contention that these analyzers, designed for telecommunications with specific features for telecom applications, should be classified as such. The decision was rendered on November 18, 2008, by Mrs. Chitra Saha, Member of the Authority for Advance Rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>