<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 904 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434389</link>
    <description>The ITAT bench ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that section 206AA does not override section 90(2) and DTAA provisions. The bench directed reconsideration of tax rates under DTAA by the tax authorities and upheld the claim for a refund of excess TDS. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity of reassessment based on DTAA rates and acknowledging the validity of the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 04:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 904 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434389</link>
      <description>The ITAT bench ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that section 206AA does not override section 90(2) and DTAA provisions. The bench directed reconsideration of tax rates under DTAA by the tax authorities and upheld the claim for a refund of excess TDS. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity of reassessment based on DTAA rates and acknowledging the validity of the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>