https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306755 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was granted because the complaint had already been filed, the properties stood attached, and custodial interrogation was not required. On those facts, the HC exercised discretion in favour of pre-arrest protection and found no basis to refuse bail. en-us Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2023 02:54:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306755 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was granted because the complaint had already been filed, the properties stood attached, and custodial interrogation was not required. On those facts, the HC exercised discretion in favour of pre-arrest protection and found no basis to refuse bail. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306755