https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306758 A writ challenge to an auction notice failed because the only ground raised was the alleged invalidity of Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu VAT Rules, 2007, and that provision had already been upheld by the Supreme Court. With the statutory basis for interference removed, the HC found no reason to disturb the consequential auction notice. The petitioner was nevertheless given liberty to pursue the statutory appeal against the assessment orders within the prescribed time, preserving the alternative remedy despite dismissal of the writ petition. en-us Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2023 02:54:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306758 A writ challenge to an auction notice failed because the only ground raised was the alleged invalidity of Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu VAT Rules, 2007, and that provision had already been upheld by the Supreme Court. With the statutory basis for interference removed, the HC found no reason to disturb the consequential auction notice. The petitioner was nevertheless given liberty to pursue the statutory appeal against the assessment orders within the prescribed time, preserving the alternative remedy despite dismissal of the writ petition. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306758