<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 139 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31897</link>
    <description>The applications for rectification of a mistake apparent on record in the Final Order were allowed, leading to the recall of the order for fresh hearing of appeals. Discrepancies in the classification proposals of goods under different headings were acknowledged, prompting the need for reconsideration. The Tribunal expressed disappointment in the Revenue&#039;s case handling, emphasizing the necessity for a more effective and dedicated approach to presenting cases before the Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 139 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31897</link>
      <description>The applications for rectification of a mistake apparent on record in the Final Order were allowed, leading to the recall of the order for fresh hearing of appeals. Discrepancies in the classification proposals of goods under different headings were acknowledged, prompting the need for reconsideration. The Tribunal expressed disappointment in the Revenue&#039;s case handling, emphasizing the necessity for a more effective and dedicated approach to presenting cases before the Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>