<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 882 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434367</link>
    <description>In an SC bail matter arising from alleged misuse of input credit, the Court held that continued pre-trial detention was unnecessary because the appellant had remained in custody since 27.01.2022, the charge-sheet had been filed, and a similarly placed co-accused had already been granted bail. On that basis, the refusal of relief was set aside and bail was granted. The decision reflects the principle that once investigation is complete and further custody is not required, pre-trial incarceration should not be prolonged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 882 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434367</link>
      <description>In an SC bail matter arising from alleged misuse of input credit, the Court held that continued pre-trial detention was unnecessary because the appellant had remained in custody since 27.01.2022, the charge-sheet had been filed, and a similarly placed co-accused had already been granted bail. On that basis, the refusal of relief was set aside and bail was granted. The decision reflects the principle that once investigation is complete and further custody is not required, pre-trial incarceration should not be prolonged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>