<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 233 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31894</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed various issues in the judgment, emphasizing transaction genuineness, loss quantification, and revised deduction claims. The Tribunal&#039;s premature focus on quantification without addressing transaction genuineness was deemed incorrect. The decisions on depreciation claims and revised deduction claims favored the assessee and were upheld. The references were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 233 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31894</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed various issues in the judgment, emphasizing transaction genuineness, loss quantification, and revised deduction claims. The Tribunal&#039;s premature focus on quantification without addressing transaction genuineness was deemed incorrect. The decisions on depreciation claims and revised deduction claims favored the assessee and were upheld. The references were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>