<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 853 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434338</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was unjustified. The tribunal found that the delay in filing the audit report was due to a bona fide reason of computer data crash, leading to rewriting the accounts. Emphasizing the assessee&#039;s voluntary compliance and genuine reasons for the delay, the tribunal directed the assessing officer to delete the penalty of Rs. 1,50,000 imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 20:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 853 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434338</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was unjustified. The tribunal found that the delay in filing the audit report was due to a bona fide reason of computer data crash, leading to rewriting the accounts. Emphasizing the assessee&#039;s voluntary compliance and genuine reasons for the delay, the tribunal directed the assessing officer to delete the penalty of Rs. 1,50,000 imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>