<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 232 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31890</link>
    <description>The court held that the refusal to renew the exemption of Umaid Charitable Trust under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act was erroneous. The trust&#039;s primary objective was charitable, and a single expenditure on temple repair did not alter its charitable nature. The court quashed the order, declaring the trust registered under Section 80G from 1.4.2004 onwards with all benefits. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 232 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31890</link>
      <description>The court held that the refusal to renew the exemption of Umaid Charitable Trust under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act was erroneous. The trust&#039;s primary objective was charitable, and a single expenditure on temple repair did not alter its charitable nature. The court quashed the order, declaring the trust registered under Section 80G from 1.4.2004 onwards with all benefits. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>