<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1282 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306728</link>
    <description>E-Infochips Ltd. was excluded from the transfer pricing comparables set because its service income did not meet the prescribed 75% filter and its diverse functions were not supported by reliable segmental information. The Tribunal followed earlier coordinate bench decisions and the same view taken on similar facts for the relevant assessment year, finding no basis to depart from that consistent approach. The exclusion was therefore upheld and the revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 08:49:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1282 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306728</link>
      <description>E-Infochips Ltd. was excluded from the transfer pricing comparables set because its service income did not meet the prescribed 75% filter and its diverse functions were not supported by reliable segmental information. The Tribunal followed earlier coordinate bench decisions and the same view taken on similar facts for the relevant assessment year, finding no basis to depart from that consistent approach. The exclusion was therefore upheld and the revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>