https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306731 Anticipatory bail was extended in a complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, where the petitioners were sought to be proceeded against for offences under sections 3 and 4. The Court noted that a similarly placed co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail and that, on the facts placed before it, custodial interrogation of the petitioners was not required. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the complaint, the Court found it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail. en-us Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2023 08:49:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306731 Anticipatory bail was extended in a complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, where the petitioners were sought to be proceeded against for offences under sections 3 and 4. The Court noted that a similarly placed co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail and that, on the facts placed before it, custodial interrogation of the petitioners was not required. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the complaint, the Court found it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306731