<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 1053 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306722</link>
    <description>Section 31(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is treated as permitting an arbitral tribunal to make an interim award on an admitted claim, including a claim analogous to a judgment on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. A quantified liability stated in the defence and then described as adjusted against the other side&#039;s claim was regarded as a clear, positive and unequivocal admission to that extent. The label of adjustment, as distinct from set-off or counterclaim, did not defeat the admitted character of the sum or bar interim relief for it. The commentary notes that a separate counterclaim does not prevent an interim award on the admitted amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 1053 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306722</link>
      <description>Section 31(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is treated as permitting an arbitral tribunal to make an interim award on an admitted claim, including a claim analogous to a judgment on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. A quantified liability stated in the defence and then described as adjusted against the other side&#039;s claim was regarded as a clear, positive and unequivocal admission to that extent. The label of adjustment, as distinct from set-off or counterclaim, did not defeat the admitted character of the sum or bar interim relief for it. The commentary notes that a separate counterclaim does not prevent an interim award on the admitted amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>