<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 816 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306720</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Revenue challenging the order of the CIT(A) regarding tax deduction u/s.195 for payments to PCB for live telecast was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing a similar case precedent where live broadcasting payments were not considered royalty under the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds for intervention and affirmed the order, concluding that tax deduction u/s.195 was not required for the payments made to PCB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 816 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306720</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Revenue challenging the order of the CIT(A) regarding tax deduction u/s.195 for payments to PCB for live telecast was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing a similar case precedent where live broadcasting payments were not considered royalty under the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds for intervention and affirmed the order, concluding that tax deduction u/s.195 was not required for the payments made to PCB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>