<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 819 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434304</link>
    <description>HC upheld petitioner&#039;s refund claim by setting aside the limitation-based rejection. Respondent conceded the unsustainability of the original order. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration, finding no need to extensively examine challenges to GST rules and circulars. The time period exclusion was acknowledged, allowing potential refund processing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 819 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434304</link>
      <description>HC upheld petitioner&#039;s refund claim by setting aside the limitation-based rejection. Respondent conceded the unsustainability of the original order. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration, finding no need to extensively examine challenges to GST rules and circulars. The time period exclusion was acknowledged, allowing potential refund processing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>