<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 810 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434295</link>
    <description>Interest on advances that was reversed in the books after accounts became non-performing assets under RBI prudential norms was not permitted to be excluded from taxable income under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Act was treated as a self-contained code, so RBI accounting directions could not by themselves create a tax deduction or override statutory conditions. Because the assessee had not written off the amount as a bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii), and the claim was not supported by Section 43D, the reversed interest remained taxable. The court also noted that any claim had to be made through the proper statutory route, such as a revised return or timely adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 810 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434295</link>
      <description>Interest on advances that was reversed in the books after accounts became non-performing assets under RBI prudential norms was not permitted to be excluded from taxable income under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Act was treated as a self-contained code, so RBI accounting directions could not by themselves create a tax deduction or override statutory conditions. Because the assessee had not written off the amount as a bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii), and the claim was not supported by Section 43D, the reversed interest remained taxable. The court also noted that any claim had to be made through the proper statutory route, such as a revised return or timely adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>