<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 792 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide details supporting the grounds of appeal. The assessment based on cash deposits during the demonetization period was confirmed, as the appellant did not respond to notices or submit any material evidence, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 792 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide details supporting the grounds of appeal. The assessment based on cash deposits during the demonetization period was confirmed, as the appellant did not respond to notices or submit any material evidence, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>