<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 774 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434259</link>
    <description>Interest on refund of a pre-deposit made for appellate proceedings was payable from the date of deposit, because such payment is treated as a statutory pre-condition for pursuing the remedy and not as an ordinary refund claim. The Tribunal relied on existing precedent, the governing statutory scheme, and the Board circular to hold that interest accrues from the date the amount was deposited, rather than only after three months from the refund application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 21:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 774 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434259</link>
      <description>Interest on refund of a pre-deposit made for appellate proceedings was payable from the date of deposit, because such payment is treated as a statutory pre-condition for pursuing the remedy and not as an ordinary refund claim. The Tribunal relied on existing precedent, the governing statutory scheme, and the Board circular to hold that interest accrues from the date the amount was deposited, rather than only after three months from the refund application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>