https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434257 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in the case involving a dispute over Central Excise valuation under Sections 4 and 4A. The penalty imposed under Rule 26(1) was set aside as no malicious intent was found on the part of the appellants. The decision emphasized the importance of considering specific circumstances and intent in determining valuation methods and penalty imposition in Central Excise matters. en-us Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:36:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434257 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in the case involving a dispute over Central Excise valuation under Sections 4 and 4A. The penalty imposed under Rule 26(1) was set aside as no malicious intent was found on the part of the appellants. The decision emphasized the importance of considering specific circumstances and intent in determining valuation methods and penalty imposition in Central Excise matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434257