<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1409 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306714</link>
    <description>Settlement under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and issuance of a discharge certificate triggered the statutory deeming fiction in section 127(6) of Chapter V of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019. As the Commissionerate confirmed that the matter had been included in the settled cases list, the pending appeal before the Tribunal was treated as withdrawn, and no further merits adjudication was required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 20:47:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1409 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306714</link>
      <description>Settlement under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and issuance of a discharge certificate triggered the statutory deeming fiction in section 127(6) of Chapter V of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019. As the Commissionerate confirmed that the matter had been included in the settled cases list, the pending appeal before the Tribunal was treated as withdrawn, and no further merits adjudication was required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>