<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 130 - HIGH COURT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31875</link>
    <description>Preventive detention requires that the grounds of detention be communicated in a clear and intelligible form so the detenu can make an effective representation; a defective Tamil translation, especially for a person with limited education and Tamil-only understanding, was treated as invalid communication. The text also states that unexplained discrepancies in arrest details and in the sponsoring materials concerning recovery particulars must be clarified before subjective satisfaction is formed, because failure to do so shows lack of application of mind. On that reasoning, the detention order was held unsustainable and the detenu was directed to be released unless required in another case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 130 - HIGH COURT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31875</link>
      <description>Preventive detention requires that the grounds of detention be communicated in a clear and intelligible form so the detenu can make an effective representation; a defective Tamil translation, especially for a person with limited education and Tamil-only understanding, was treated as invalid communication. The text also states that unexplained discrepancies in arrest details and in the sponsoring materials concerning recovery particulars must be clarified before subjective satisfaction is formed, because failure to do so shows lack of application of mind. On that reasoning, the detention order was held unsustainable and the detenu was directed to be released unless required in another case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>