<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 765 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434250</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the penalty imposed under section 271B for delayed furnishing of the tax audit report under section 44AB for AY 2017-18. The ITAT found the reasons provided by the appellant to be reasonable, following the principle that penalties should not be imposed without deliberate defiance of the law. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:30:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 765 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434250</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the penalty imposed under section 271B for delayed furnishing of the tax audit report under section 44AB for AY 2017-18. The ITAT found the reasons provided by the appellant to be reasonable, following the principle that penalties should not be imposed without deliberate defiance of the law. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>