https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434242 The court found that the notice served on the secondary email id instead of the primary or updated email id was erroneous. Emphasizing the importance of valid service of notice, the court quashed the notice and subsequent proceedings. The respondent was permitted to proceed with assessment after issuing a fresh notice in compliance with the law. The petitions were allowed, with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434242 The court found that the notice served on the secondary email id instead of the primary or updated email id was erroneous. Emphasizing the importance of valid service of notice, the court quashed the notice and subsequent proceedings. The respondent was permitted to proceed with assessment after issuing a fresh notice in compliance with the law. The petitions were allowed, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434242