https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434220 The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as it was time-barred due to limitation issues. The Tribunal found that the account did not qualify as a running account, email communications and cheque payments did not constitute an acknowledgment of debt, and the interest claimed was not valid for invoices beyond the limitation period. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was directed to seek other legal remedies. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 19 Feb 2023 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434220 The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as it was time-barred due to limitation issues. The Tribunal found that the account did not qualify as a running account, email communications and cheque payments did not constitute an acknowledgment of debt, and the interest claimed was not valid for invoices beyond the limitation period. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was directed to seek other legal remedies. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434220